Showing posts with label via. Show all posts
Showing posts with label via. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

Restore database via automated order

Hi folks,

I got a script which restores a database. It works fine
if it is running in my Query Analyzer.

It fails when I put this script in an automated schedule using the
SQL agent.

This is my script

RESTORE DATABASE [RestoreTest]
FROM DISK = N'E:\sqlbak\RestoreTest.BAK'
WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY

and this is the error message from the scheduler (Sorry its in German)

Executing as User dbo. Exclusiv access to database not possible
because
it is in use (which is not).. Rest may be clear ;-))

Ausfhrt als Benutzer: dbo. Exklusiver Zugriff auf die Datenbank ist
nicht mglich, da die Datenbank gerade verwendet wird. [SQLSTATE
42000] (Fehler 3101) RESTORE DATABASE wird fehlerbedingt beendet.
[SQLSTATE 42000] (Fehler 3013). Fehler bei Schritt

Do you have any suggestion to me ?"FoxRunner" <claus.rauchschindel@.dds.de> wrote in message
news:b7c717fb.0312090728.1b374ba1@.posting.google.c om...
> Hi folks,
> I got a script which restores a database. It works fine
> if it is running in my Query Analyzer.
> It fails when I put this script in an automated schedule using the
> SQL agent.
> This is my script
> RESTORE DATABASE [RestoreTest]
> FROM DISK = N'E:\sqlbak\RestoreTest.BAK'
> WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY
> and this is the error message from the scheduler (Sorry its in German)
> Executing as User dbo. Exclusiv access to database not possible
> because
> it is in use (which is not).. Rest may be clear ;-))
> Ausfhrt als Benutzer: dbo. Exklusiver Zugriff auf die Datenbank ist
> nicht mglich, da die Datenbank gerade verwendet wird. [SQLSTATE
> 42000] (Fehler 3101) RESTORE DATABASE wird fehlerbedingt beendet.
> [SQLSTATE 42000] (Fehler 3013). Fehler bei Schritt
> Do you have any suggestion to me ?

Some process is accessing the database at the time you want to restore it.
This may be the job itself, if you set the database context for the restore
step to RestoreTest, instead of master.

Even if that is the issue, a better solution is to disconnect any open
connections. You can add a new first job step to do ALTER DATABASE
RestoreTest SET OFFLINE WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE. Then, after restoring it,
use ALTER DATABASE RestoreTest SET ONLINE to make the database available
again. Make sure these steps use master as the database context. This
assumes, of course, that it is acceptable in your environment to disconnect
any client applications without warning.

Simon|||I think you're looking at the most common cause of failure on a
restore: the database is not in DBO or single-user mode. I don't know
off-hand how you would force the DB into DBO mode in a job, but I'm
certain there is a way. The more I look at the error message the more
certain I am as to this is what is happening.

And you should be able to look up the error message numbers on TechNet
to get the English version.

claus.rauchschindel@.dds.de (FoxRunner) wrote in message news:<b7c717fb.0312090728.1b374ba1@.posting.google.com>...
> Hi folks,
> I got a script which restores a database. It works fine
> if it is running in my Query Analyzer.
> It fails when I put this script in an automated schedule using the
> SQL agent.
> This is my script
> RESTORE DATABASE [RestoreTest]
> FROM DISK = N'E:\sqlbak\RestoreTest.BAK'
> WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY
> and this is the error message from the scheduler (Sorry its in German)
> Executing as User dbo. Exclusiv access to database not possible
> because
> it is in use (which is not).. Rest may be clear ;-))
> Ausfhrt als Benutzer: dbo. Exklusiver Zugriff auf die Datenbank ist
> nicht mglich, da die Datenbank gerade verwendet wird. [SQLSTATE
> 42000] (Fehler 3101) RESTORE DATABASE wird fehlerbedingt beendet.
> [SQLSTATE 42000] (Fehler 3013). Fehler bei Schritt|||wwphx@.hotmail.com (P.D.N. Tame) wrote in message news:<bcc5d277.0312091343.5151cb59@.posting.google.com>...
> I think you're looking at the most common cause of failure on a
> restore: the database is not in DBO or single-user mode. I don't know
> off-hand how you would force the DB into DBO mode in a job, but I'm
> certain there is a way. The more I look at the error message the more
> certain I am as to this is what is happening.
> And you should be able to look up the error message numbers on TechNet
> to get the English version.

Thanks a lot. I think I can proceed from here by myself
;-))|||"Simon Hayes" <sql@.hayes.ch> wrote in message news:<3fd61c16_2@.news.bluewin.ch>...
> "FoxRunner" <claus.rauchschindel@.dds.de> wrote in message
> news:b7c717fb.0312090728.1b374ba1@.posting.google.c om...
> > Hi folks,
> > I got a script which restores a database. It works fine
> > if it is running in my Query Analyzer.
> > It fails when I put this script in an automated schedule using the
> > SQL agent.
> > This is my script
> > RESTORE DATABASE [RestoreTest]
> > FROM DISK = N'E:\sqlbak\RestoreTest.BAK'
> > WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY
> > and this is the error message from the scheduler (Sorry its in German)
> > Executing as User dbo. Exclusiv access to database not possible
> > because
> > it is in use (which is not).. Rest may be clear ;-))
> > Ausfhrt als Benutzer: dbo. Exklusiver Zugriff auf die Datenbank ist
> > nicht mglich, da die Datenbank gerade verwendet wird. [SQLSTATE
> > 42000] (Fehler 3101) RESTORE DATABASE wird fehlerbedingt beendet.
> > [SQLSTATE 42000] (Fehler 3013). Fehler bei Schritt
> > Do you have any suggestion to me ?
> Some process is accessing the database at the time you want to restore it.
> This may be the job itself, if you set the database context for the restore
> step to RestoreTest, instead of master.
> Even if that is the issue, a better solution is to disconnect any open
> connections. You can add a new first job step to do ALTER DATABASE
> RestoreTest SET OFFLINE WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE. Then, after restoring it,
> use ALTER DATABASE RestoreTest SET ONLINE to make the database available
> again. Make sure these steps use master as the database context. This
> assumes, of course, that it is acceptable in your environment to disconnect
> any client applications without warning.
> Simon

Simon,

Thats it. Your suggestion to change the context from Restore-Test to
Master was succesfull.

Embedding the ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE does not have any influence to the
result.
I let in because I think it is a better way of programming.

Thank Mate and best regards to Switzerland|||To add to the other responses, check to ensure the database context for your
restore job is set to a database other than the one your are trying to
restore. It may be that the restore job itself is the culprit.

--
Hope this helps.

Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP

"FoxRunner" <claus.rauchschindel@.dds.de> wrote in message
news:b7c717fb.0312090728.1b374ba1@.posting.google.c om...
> Hi folks,
> I got a script which restores a database. It works fine
> if it is running in my Query Analyzer.
> It fails when I put this script in an automated schedule using the
> SQL agent.
> This is my script
> RESTORE DATABASE [RestoreTest]
> FROM DISK = N'E:\sqlbak\RestoreTest.BAK'
> WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY
> and this is the error message from the scheduler (Sorry its in German)
> Executing as User dbo. Exclusiv access to database not possible
> because
> it is in use (which is not).. Rest may be clear ;-))
> Ausfhrt als Benutzer: dbo. Exklusiver Zugriff auf die Datenbank ist
> nicht mglich, da die Datenbank gerade verwendet wird. [SQLSTATE
> 42000] (Fehler 3101) RESTORE DATABASE wird fehlerbedingt beendet.
> [SQLSTATE 42000] (Fehler 3013). Fehler bei Schritt
> Do you have any suggestion to me ?

Friday, March 9, 2012

restore a transaction

Hello,
Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by acident via
an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20 table
involved when record is created or deleted.
MCWell I would restore the latest backup of the database to a dev enviornment
and locate that one record, then linked togeather all the information about
that record from each table and go from there to determine what can be
restored. It makes a difference on the type of data that was stored about
the record.. if that record is just a single entry or it it has several
detailed entries in a log table about that records activity in the database.
"CAMC1" wrote:
> Hello,
> Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by acident via
> an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
> touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20 table
> involved when record is created or deleted.
> MC
>
>|||That is what I tought.
I told the user that it is faster to re-create the record via his
application the restoring 1 user transaction.
MC
"JosephPruiett" <JosephPruiett@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A36EF0B2-03E8-476D-A8FD-AC867228C453@.microsoft.com...
> Well I would restore the latest backup of the database to a dev
enviornment
> and locate that one record, then linked togeather all the information
about
> that record from each table and go from there to determine what can be
> restored. It makes a difference on the type of data that was stored about
> the record.. if that record is just a single entry or it it has several
> detailed entries in a log table about that records activity in the
database.
>
> "CAMC1" wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by acident
via
> > an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
> > touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20 table
> > involved when record is created or deleted.
> >
> > MC
> >
> >
> >|||ABSOLUTELY!!!
Good way to handle it! It's rarely cost effective to restore just a small
amount of data.
--
Arnie Rowland
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
"CAMC1" <webmaster@.ozoptics.com> wrote in message
news:%23IEvOoDrGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> That is what I tought.
> I told the user that it is faster to re-create the record via his
> application the restoring 1 user transaction.
> MC
> "JosephPruiett" <JosephPruiett@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A36EF0B2-03E8-476D-A8FD-AC867228C453@.microsoft.com...
>> Well I would restore the latest backup of the database to a dev
> enviornment
>> and locate that one record, then linked togeather all the information
> about
>> that record from each table and go from there to determine what can be
>> restored. It makes a difference on the type of data that was stored
>> about
>> the record.. if that record is just a single entry or it it has several
>> detailed entries in a log table about that records activity in the
> database.
>>
>> "CAMC1" wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by acident
> via
>> > an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
>> > touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20
>> > table
>> > involved when record is created or deleted.
>> >
>> > MC
>> >
>> >
>> >
>|||Thanks
MC
"Arnie Rowland" <arnie@.1568.com> wrote in message
news:ecgEBzDrGHA.4032@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> ABSOLUTELY!!!
> Good way to handle it! It's rarely cost effective to restore just a small
> amount of data.
> --
> Arnie Rowland
> Most good judgment comes from experience.
> Most experience comes from bad judgment.
> - Anonymous
>
> "CAMC1" <webmaster@.ozoptics.com> wrote in message
> news:%23IEvOoDrGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> > That is what I tought.
> > I told the user that it is faster to re-create the record via his
> > application the restoring 1 user transaction.
> > MC
> >
> > "JosephPruiett" <JosephPruiett@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
> > news:A36EF0B2-03E8-476D-A8FD-AC867228C453@.microsoft.com...
> >> Well I would restore the latest backup of the database to a dev
> > enviornment
> >> and locate that one record, then linked togeather all the information
> > about
> >> that record from each table and go from there to determine what can be
> >> restored. It makes a difference on the type of data that was stored
> >> about
> >> the record.. if that record is just a single entry or it it has several
> >> detailed entries in a log table about that records activity in the
> > database.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "CAMC1" wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> > Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by
acident
> > via
> >> > an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
> >> > touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20
> >> > table
> >> > involved when record is created or deleted.
> >> >
> >> > MC
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
>|||"CAMC1" <webmaster@.ozoptics.com> wrote in message
news:%23IEvOoDrGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> That is what I tought.
> I told the user that it is faster to re-create the record via his
> application the restoring 1 user transaction.
You forgot the "AND NEVER DO THAT AGAIN!" part. :-)
> MC
> "JosephPruiett" <JosephPruiett@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:A36EF0B2-03E8-476D-A8FD-AC867228C453@.microsoft.com...
> > Well I would restore the latest backup of the database to a dev
> enviornment
> > and locate that one record, then linked togeather all the information
> about
> > that record from each table and go from there to determine what can be
> > restored. It makes a difference on the type of data that was stored
about
> > the record.. if that record is just a single entry or it it has several
> > detailed entries in a log table about that records activity in the
> database.
> >
> >
> >
> > "CAMC1" wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > > Someone came to me and asked me to restore a record, deleted by
acident
> via
> > > an ERP program. Problem is how do we restore only his record without
> > > touching integrity of other peoples record. There are more then 20
table
> > > involved when record is created or deleted.
> > >
> > > MC
> > >
> > >
> > >
>

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

RESTORE 64-bit database via 32-bit GUI...

Hello all,
I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a database
on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore was
successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode. I
tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the files
were partially restored.
I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I used
OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the database
successfully.
So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
Thanks...Hi
On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> database
> on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> was
> successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> I
> tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> files
> were partially restored.
> I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> used
> OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> database
> successfully.
> So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> Thanks...
>|||Yeah, it's 8.00.760 (SP3)...
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:
> Hi
> On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> > database
> > on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> > was
> > successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> > I
> > tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> > files
> > were partially restored.
> >
> > I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> > used
> > OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> > compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> > database
> > successfully.
> >
> > So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> > 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
>
>

Saturday, February 25, 2012

RESTORE 64-bit database via 32-bit GUI...

Hello all,
I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a database
on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore was
successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode. I
tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the files
were partially restored.
I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I used
OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the database
successfully.
So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
Thanks...
Hi
On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
Regards
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> database
> on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> was
> successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> I
> tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> files
> were partially restored.
> I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> used
> OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> database
> successfully.
> So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> Thanks...
>
|||Yeah, it's 8.00.760 (SP3)...
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:

> Hi
> On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
>
>

RESTORE 64-bit database via 32-bit GUI...

Hello all,
I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a database
on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore was
successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode. I
tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the files
were partially restored.
I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I used
OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the database
successfully.
So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
Thanks...Hi
On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> database
> on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> was
> successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> I
> tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> files
> were partially restored.
> I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> used
> OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> database
> successfully.
> So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> Thanks...
>|||Yeah, it's 8.00.760 (SP3)...
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:
> Hi
> On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> > database
> > on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> > was
> > successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> > I
> > tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> > files
> > were partially restored.
> >
> > I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> > used
> > OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> > compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> > database
> > successfully.
> >
> > So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> > 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> >
> > Thanks...
> >
>
>

RESTORE 64-bit database via 32-bit GUI...

Hello all,
I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a database
on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore was
successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode. I
tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the files
were partially restored.
I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I used
OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the database
successfully.
So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
Thanks...Hi
On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
Regards
--
Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
Zurich, Switzerland
IM: mike@.epprecht.net
MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
"BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
> Hello all,
> I'm trying to use the 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, to restore a
> database
> on one of our 64-bit servers. The GUI returns a prompt that the restore
> was
> successful but the GUI indicates that the database is in a Loading mode.
> I
> tried to issue a recovery command but it fails saying that some of the
> files
> were partially restored.
> I figured that there is a problem using the 32-bit client utility so I
> used
> OSQL, via SQL Server Agent, on the 64-bit to ensure that I was using a
> compatible 64-bit utility. By doing so, I was able to restore the
> database
> successfully.
> So my question is, is not being able to restore a 64-bit database via a
> 32-bit GUI, on a remote server, a known issue?
> Thanks...
>|||Yeah, it's 8.00.760 (SP3)...
"Mike Epprecht (SQL MVP)" wrote:

> Hi
> On the 32 bit client, have you installed a minimum of sp3a?
> Regards
> --
> Mike Epprecht, Microsoft SQL Server MVP
> Zurich, Switzerland
> IM: mike@.epprecht.net
> MVP Program: http://www.microsoft.com/mvp
> Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/epprecht/
> "BATMAN" <BATMAN@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8C8842C1-37B4-4AFB-BCB4-A63FD58DC323@.microsoft.com...
>
>